I'm running the below query and wanted to ask about how i could optimise this query. This query has been in use where i work for a while and i have the feeling that it could be optimised as its run regularly with different parameters for reporting purposes
First run takes around 2 minutes. Subsequent runs take around 30s as the query cache has kicked in i believe.
The tags
table has over 15million rows and contains tags for users
as well as other tables like companies
.
CREATE TABLE `tags` (
`id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`type` enum('company','review','job','sector','user') NOT NULL DEFAULT 'company',
`fk_id` int(11) DEFAULT '0',
`tag_key` varchar(24) DEFAULT NULL,
`tag_value` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL,
`created_at` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`updated_at` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `tag_key_value` (`tag_key`,`tag_value`) USING BTREE,
KEY `fk_id_key` (`fk_id`,`tag_key`) USING BTREE,
FULLTEXT KEY `tag_value` (`tag_value`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=15725767 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
The users
table has around 450k rows.
CREATE TABLE `users` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`username` varchar(30) DEFAULT NULL,
`title` int(1) NOT NULL,
`firstname` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
`surname` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
`email` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`password` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
`university` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`university_start_year` varchar(20) NOT NULL,
`university_end_year` varchar(20) NOT NULL,
`degree_discipline` varchar(3) DEFAULT NULL,
`signup_date` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
`newsletter_subscription` int(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
...
`created_at` datetime NOT NULL,
`updated_at` datetime NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `university` (`university`) USING BTREE,
KEY `university_start_year` (`university_start_year`) USING BTREE,
KEY `university_end_year` (`university_end_year`) USING BTREE,
KEY `degree_discipline` (`degree_discipline`) USING BTREE,
..
KEY `email` (`email`),
FULLTEXT KEY `firstname` (`firstname`,`surname`,`comments`,`email`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1188075 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
I don't have the ability to change the table structure or indexes so any input on the optimising the query would be greatly appreciated. I thought that maybe using sub queries or optimising how the joins work would be the first point to address but i'm a bit lost of how i would tackle this.
SELECT u.firstname, u.email
FROM users AS u
LEFT JOIN tags as tags ON tags.fk_id = u.id AND tags.type = "user" AND tags.tag_key = "option"
LEFT JOIN tags as tags6 ON tags6.fk_id = u.id AND tags6.type = "user" AND tags6.tag_key = "role"
LEFT JOIN tags as tags7 ON tags7.fk_id = u.id AND tags7.type = "user" AND tags7.tag_key = "sector"
WHERE (user_type IN ("1")) AND
(tags.tag_key = "option" AND tags.tag_value IN ("1", "2", "8")) AND
((degree_discipline IN ("ACC", "ACT", "ACF", "INS", "CBN", "INV", "RBN", "BNK", "ECO", "FIN", "MAT"))
OR (tags6.tag_key = "role" AND tags6.tag_value IN ("ACC", "ACT", "ACF", "INS", "CBN", "INV", "RBN", "BNK", "ECO", "FIN", "MAT"))
OR (tags7.tag_key = "sector" AND tags7.tag_value IN ("ACC", "ACT", "ACF", "INS", "CBN", "INV", "RBN", "BNK", "ECO", "FIN", "MAT"))) AND
(u.signup_date >= "2012-09-01" ) AND
newsletter_subscription = "1"
GROUP BY u.email
Explain
If there's any other information that i can provide that would be helpful let me know.
Server Environment
These queries are being run on a replication slave for reporting purposes. This replication server has hourly backups run on it via mysqldump
which could be affecting the caches but thats only a guess at this point.
tags
table. Is there a better way to combine this data so i canfilter the rows in thetags
table related to theusers.id
. I haven't got a lot of experience with SQL so if there's a more efficient way to tackle this i'd open to any suggestions.LEFT JOIN
together withOR
is really off-the-wall. For example,tag6
might have zero (LEFT
) or more (JOIN
) rows for this user, if it does have any rows, then include the user if key and value are role and ...;OR
include the user for other reasons.