Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with database-agnostic
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 82
Only use this tag when the question does not depend on a particular database management system.
20
votes
Accepted
Why won't some DBMS's allow rollback for certain DDL statements?
The reason why this works in PostgreSQL is that the system catalogs are regular tables. So creating a new function, for example, just requires inserting a row into the pg_proc table, changing the def …
- 10.6k